That is description for the different sorts of paper at COLING 2018

onsdag 23 oktober, 2019

That is description for the different sorts of paper at COLING 2018

it is vital to find the paper that is right so that you can assist get top quality reviews for the work. Remember that all paper kinds utilize the template that is same download the phrase and LaTeX templates here: coling2018.zip

Computationally-aided linguistic analysis

The main focus with this paper kind is brand brand new insight that is linguistic. It could take the type of an empirical research of some linguistic trend, or of a theoretical outcome about a linguistically-relevant formal system.

  1. Relevance: Is this paper highly relevant to COLING?
  2. Readability/clarity: Through the real means the paper is created, could you inform just exactly what research concern had been addressed, that which was done and exactly why, and exactly how the outcomes relate solely to the study concern?
  3. Originality: How initial and revolutionary could be the extensive research described? Originality could possibly be within the question that is linguistic addressed, within the methodology put on the linguistic concern, or perhaps in the mixture for the two.
  4. Technical correctness/soundness: may be the extensive research described in the paper theoretically sound and proper? Is one to trust the claims associated with paper—are they sustained by the analysis or experiments and writing paper help so are the total results precisely interpreted?
  5. Reproducibility: can there be detail that is sufficient some body in identical industry to reproduce/replicate the outcomes? n/a for many kinds of theoretical results
  6. Data/code supply: may be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the study community or perhaps is here a compelling explanation offered why this is simply not feasible?
  7. Generalizability: Does the paper show just just how the outcomes generalize, either by deepening our comprehension of some linguistic system in basic or by showing methodology which can be placed on other issues aswell? n/a for several kinds of theoretical results
  8. Significant comparison: Does the paper clearly destination the described utilize respect to literature that is existing? Can it be clear both what’s novel within the extensive research presented and just how it develops on previous work?
  9. Substance: Does this paper have sufficient substance for the paper that is full-length or would it not reap the benefits of further development?
  10. General suggestion: there are numerous submissions that are good for slots at COLING 2018; essential can it be to feature this one? Will people learn a complete great deal by scanning this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is much better to vary from other reviewers rather than grade every thing in the middle.

NLP engineering test paper

This paper kind fits the majority of submissions at current CL and NLP seminars.

  1. Relevance: Is this paper highly relevant to COLING?
  2. Readability/clarity: Through the means the paper is written, are you able to inform just exactly what research concern had been addressed, that which was done and exactly why, and exactly how the outcome relate genuinely to the study concern?
    1. Could it be clear what the authors’ hypothesis is? what exactly is it? A text input reponse
    2. Will it be clear the way the writers have actually tested their theory? y/n
  3. Originality: How initial and revolutionary may be the research described? Observe that originality could include an innovative new strategy or a fresh task, or it may lie into the careful analysis of what goes on whenever a understood strategy is placed on a known task (where in fact the pairing is novel) or in the careful analysis of what the results are whenever a understood strategy is placed on an understood task in a language that is new.
  4. Technical correctness/soundness: could be the extensive research described in the paper theoretically sound and proper? Is one able to trust the claims of this paper—are they supported by the analysis or experiments and generally are the total results precisely interpreted?
    1. Can it be clear the way the outcomes confirm/refute the theory, or will be the outcomes inconclusive?
    2. Perform some writers explain the way the outcomes follow from their theory (rather than state, other possible confounding element)?
    3. Would be the datasets utilized plainly described and so are they right for testing the hypothesis as previously mentioned?
  5. Reproducibility: will there be detail that is sufficient somebody in identical industry to reproduce/replicate the outcomes?
  6. Data/code access: may be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the investigation community or perhaps is here a reason that is compelling why it is not possible?
  7. Error analysis: Does the paper provide a thoughtful mistake analysis, which searches for linguistic habits when you look at the forms of mistakes produced by the system(s) assessed and sheds light on either avenues for future work or even the supply of the strengths/weaknesses for the systems?
  8. Significant contrast: Does the paper clearly put the described use respect to current literary works? Will it be clear both what exactly is novel into the extensive research presented and just how it develops on previous work?
  9. Substance: performs this paper have sufficient substance for a paper that is full-length or wouldn’t it reap the benefits of further work?
  10. General suggestion: there are numerous good submissions contending for slots at COLING 2018; essential can it be to feature this 1? Will people discover great deal by scanning this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is much better to vary from other reviewers rather than grade every thing in the centre.

Legg igjen en kommentar

Din e-postadresse vil ikke bli publisert.

0