A Bible class recently ended up being involved in a conversation Ezra’s that is regarding command the males of Israel, when you look at the post-Captivity period, store their international wives (Ezra 10). The writing checks out:
“And the priest endured up, and stated unto them, ‘You have actually trespassed, while having married foreign ladies, to increase the shame of Israel. Now therefore make confession unto Jehovah, the God of the dads, and do his pleasure; and split up yourselves from the peoples for the land, and from the women’ ukrainian brides that are foreign (vv. 10-11).
The instructor, that is a teacher in a Christian college, argued that Ezra’s demand (v. 11) had been granted on his or her own effort. He further contended that this guy of Jesus created an issue much more serious than exactly exactly what existed currently, since it put these feamales in jobs of difficulty, forcing them into immoral lifestyles.
He also cited Malachi 2:16 where Jesus stated he “hated” divorce or separation. Supposedly, this nullified Ezra’s rash action. Had been the gentleman correct in their analysis? Consider the after facets.
The teacher is very mistaken in the view of the situation, in which he is presumptuous in the mindset toward certainly one of God’s magnificent servants.
The inspired narrative says regarding this remarkable priest/scribe. “For Ezra had set their heart to find what the law states of Jehovah, and also to take action, also to show in Israel statutes and ordinances” (7:10). Absent any information that is explicit this document that casts a shadow upon Ezra, there’s no reason in making the fee described above.
The Mosaic Prohibition
As Israel ready to enter Canaan, the individuals had been strictly forbidden to become listed on in wedding utilizing the pagans in “the land” (Deuteronomy 7:1ff). The prohibition that is explicit this: these people were which will make no covenants utilizing the heathen, nor demonstrate to them mercy. These tribes “in the land” had been a wicked, idolatrous individuals, whoever “cup of iniquity” ended up being overflowing (Genesis 15:16). And thus Moses declared:
“Neither shall you create marriages you shall not take for your son” (Deuteronomy 7:3) with them; your daughter shall not be given unto the foreigner’s son, and his daughter.
The prophet continued to explain that such unions would corrupt the Israelites (cf. 1 Kings 11:3-4). Jehovah ended up being wanting to protect their folks from their particular weaknesses in view of the sacred part in planning just how for the coming Messiah.
The Historic Situation
As soon as the Hebrews had been released from Babylonian captivity, they arrived house for their indigenous land in three waves — beneath the leadership of Zerubbabel, then Ezra, and lastly Nehemiah.
Whenever Ezra arrived, he found that some (some more than 100 males, away from roughly 29,000) had married foreign females “of the individuals associated with the land” (Ezra 10:2). It was a violation that is direct of’ injunction.
Thus, the leader that is great maybe maybe maybe not performing on their own; he previously behind him the force of law (cf. Ezra 10:2-3). This course of action ended up being a“surgery that is necessary for the welfare for the country most importantly. In many cases you will find heart-breaking temporal consequences related to wrongdoing, to state absolutely nothing associated with the possible penalty that is eternal.
Could it be maybe not significant that the folks on their own, if they heard the decree, would not arise against Ezra, billing him with a presumptive, autocratic disposition (as alleged by their “professor” critic)? Instead, they humbly stated: “we have actually greatly transgressed in this matter” (cf. 10:2,13), and “so must we do” (vv. 3,12).
As soon as the prophet Malachi represented the father as hating “divorce” (2:16), he had been showing the ideal that is divine set forth into the marriage covenant initiated in Eden. That this didn’t prohibit all divorce or separation is very obvious through the known undeniable fact that divorce proceedings ended up being authorized underneath the legislation (Deuteronomy 24:1).
Whenever one violates the legislation of Jesus by stepping into a relationship which could never be maintained, repentance needs that the union be severed. To recommend otherwise reveals this 1 will not comprehend the nature of repentance (cf. Mark 4:18; Matthew 12:41; Jonah 3:10).
A Concluding Note
In conclusion, one must add that this example had been unique to Israel that is ancient does not have any bearing on Christian/non-Christian marriages today (see 1 Corinthians 7:13-14; 1 Peter 3:1-2). Yet see: “Should a Christian Marry away from Faith?” elsewhere on our webpage.